1 |
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:18:38 +0530 |
2 |
"Nirbheek Chauhan" <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
4 |
> <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> > On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:34:18 +0530 |
6 |
> > "Nirbheek Chauhan" <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com> wrote: |
7 |
> >> How about this: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > It's utterly useless. Unlike the existing shortcut forms, what |
10 |
> > you're after isn't widely enough used to warrant its own shortcut. |
11 |
> > Use the expanded form and have done with it. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> On the contrary, the reverse of what you say is true. A simple grep of |
14 |
> the tree showed that: |
15 |
|
16 |
The problem with your simple grep is that it's simple. The problem with |
17 |
your proposed shortcut is that it's not simple. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |