Re: [gentoo-dev] OK to unmask icu-50?

[Diego Elio Pettenò]

Sounds good to me. Tinderbox was fine with the latest changes to icu.

Just for reference, next time it would be nice to unmask this when chromium
and libreoffice are both bumped (i.e., two days ago), so that people don't
have to rebuild them twice... luckily for me I kept it unmasked when
testing it ;)

Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/



On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:58 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
<phajdan.jr@g.o>wrote:

> # Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@> (04 Nov 2012)
> # Masked for testing with gcc-4.7 and to verify reverse deps
> >dev-libs/icu-49.9.1
>
> I think with icu-50.1-r2 the problems are solved. It should get more
> testing in ~arch. I'd like to unmask it.
>
> WDYT?
>
>