Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Santiago M. Mola" <coldwind@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies that're available at pkg_*inst
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:48:29
Message-Id: 3c32af40804200348j1e601f71naf13d48873f33d29@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies that're available at pkg_*inst by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
2 <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3 > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:29:10 -0700
4 > Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote:
5 >
6 > > Stop name dropping labels until you tell folk about what labels are.
7 > > I know, but I'd rather not have the notion "labels solves all" pushed
8 > > forth w/ out people knowing what it is, please.
9 >
10 > Labels are already documented and discussable in the appropriate place.
11 > This is not supposed to be a discussion about future direction. It's
12 > supposed to be about one specific issue regarding how we word things for
13 > current implementations. The two wordings in the original email do not
14 > have equivalent implications, and selecting the correct one affects
15 > whether certain problems are solvable. Let's discuss that, not what
16 > we're going to do six years from now.
17 >
18
19 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201499
20
21 --
22 Santiago M. Mola
23 Jabber ID: cooldwind@×××××.com
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list