Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>, "Hans de Graaff (graaff)" <graaff@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: xemacs-elisp-common.eclass xemacs-elisp.eclass | ||
| Date: | Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:02:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200709151652.10605.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: xemacs-elisp-common.eclass xemacs-elisp.eclass by Donnie Berkholz |
||
| 1 | On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 | > On 05:56 Sat 15 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 | > > On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 4 | > > > Also, try using { } around a block of code instead of ( ), which |
| 5 | > > > creates a subshell. |
| 6 | > > |
| 7 | > > erm, what ? () is a subshell, {} is a list of grouped commands ... |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > Right, that's what I said. What's the point of using a subshell here? |
| 10 | > That comment about environment pollution didn't make sense to me. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | the "into" part pollutes the environment |
| 13 | -mike |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: xemacs-elisp-common.eclass xemacs-elisp.eclass | Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> |