1 |
Thierry Carrez wrote: |
2 |
> Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>>>right ... once a GLEP has been hammered out and approved, there isnt really |
8 |
>>>>anything left for managers/council to do ... it's then up to whoever to get |
9 |
>>>>it done ;) |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>>They *could* do some 'creative re-org' a.k.a. remove some folks from |
12 |
>>their current roles if they are willfully breaking the rules... |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> This is the role of devrel enforcement arm. The complaint / |
16 |
> investigation / judgement / appeal process is already defined. The |
17 |
> council enters the stage only at the appeals step to limit abuse of |
18 |
> power situations (and of course to define what policy really is). |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I for one am committed to help in enforcement of any policy that has |
21 |
> been decided, but only in the limits of what we were elected for (we |
22 |
> won't replace project leads or devrel). |
23 |
|
24 |
The actual powers/role of devrel has always been a grey area. Perhaps it |
25 |
is time that the Council formalize their position so people know exactly |
26 |
what they can/can't do. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
30 |
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager |
31 |
|
32 |
--- |
33 |
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
34 |
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
35 |
|
36 |
ramereth/irc.freenode.net |