Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:07:58
Message-Id: 4a82e1d9-de0c-4854-2cfe-20262dc8af27@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process by Michael Palimaka
1 On 01/04/2017 08:09 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
2 > On 04/01/17 12:57, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
3 >> Hi all,
4 >>
5 >> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:55:27 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
6 >> [...]
7 >>> Another question: do we steel need to set STABLEREQ keyword for
8 >>> stabilization bugs? Since we now have a dedicated Stabilization
9 >>> component, STABLEREQ looks redundant.
10 >>
11 >> Ping here.
12 >>
13 >> Best regards,
14 >> Andrew Savchenko
15 >>
16 >
17 > With the changes, STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ indeed become redundant.
18 >
19 > That said, it's entirely possible some arch team members are relying on
20 > these keywords for old saved searches etc. With so many people working
21 > in isolation, it's difficult to know who is doing what.
22 >
23
24 Not sure if I like this, isn't it anyways still required for security
25 vulnerabilities bumping etc, so now we have a branching of processes
26 depending on project/category selections that needs to be taken into
27 consideration?
28
29 --
30 Kristian Fiskerstrand
31 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
32 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature