| 1 |
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:01:13 +0100 |
| 2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 17/01/15 16:03, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:59:08 +0800 |
| 5 |
> > Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >>> The problem isn't the constants, though. The problem is the |
| 7 |
> >>> resolution algorithm. There's not much point tweaking performance |
| 8 |
> >>> until the resolver is fixed to produce a correct answer... |
| 9 |
> >> |
| 10 |
> >> Patches welcome :) |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > If I send you a patch that updates all the documentation to use |
| 13 |
> > Paludis rather than Portage, will you welcome it? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> If you rewrite paludis in C99 or equally language with non-brittle |
| 17 |
> runtime (libc++ isn't really viable yet =/) I would seriously |
| 18 |
> consider it. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
There's always -static-libstdc++. Although Gentoo is still the only |
| 21 |
distribution which has trouble with having more than one libstdc++ |
| 22 |
visible at a time... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives