Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:27:42
Message-Id: CAB9SyzRvAMek+ZHoQRwRDDW1yf989CiynmOQZP4vs=jwmwaDSg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help! by Tom Wijsman
1 On 2 March 2013 22:35, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote:
2 > I first thought it was a binary, but now that I see it is actually
3 > compiled from source in the avidemux build process, we have control
4 > over it. Therefore, I'll step up to be the primary maintainer.
5 >
6 > Do you want me to keep the Qt herd in the metadata.xml as secondary?
7
8 No, I don't think that's necessary. Keeping it in video herd makes more sense.
9
10 >> Even if that wasn't the case, separate package doesn't make sense,
11 >> USE="+system-libs" might
12 >
13 > Agreed, an USE flag makes much more sense! I didn't consider this
14 > because I thought it was a binary. Sadly the system library doesn't
15 > work well with avidemux because it doesn't have any of these useful
16 > patches; but indeed, together with mantainers of this package on other
17 > distributions we should be able to push some patches upstream...
18 >
19 > Therefore, I think we should keep USE="system-libs" until avidemux is
20 > properly tested to make USE="+system-libs" appropriate.
21
22 If avidemux keeps patching ffmpeg (beyond line-endings), I don't think
23 it is wise to make system-libs the default. I originally took on this
24 package when I became a Gentoo dev ~5 years ago, but I hardly use it
25 anymore and I don't have the time to maintain this. Thanks for
26 stepping up.
27
28 --
29 Cheers,
30
31 Ben | yngwin
32 Gentoo developer
33 Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin