| 1 |
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 14:41, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 11:14, lv@××××××××××.org wrote: |
| 3 |
> > it's masked due to a bug in portage that is apparently not being fixed ("you |
| 4 |
> > shouldnt be using that anyway" is the response we got to the bug). if both |
| 5 |
> > xorg-x11 and this xfree are unmasked, for some reason an attempt to install |
| 6 |
> > one will try to install the other. xorg-x11 is stable on amd64... |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > i'm not on the xfree herd, but i remember this being a PITA on amd64. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I guess this also brings up the question, when is xorg-x11 going to be |
| 11 |
> stable on each arch and when will it be the default for the virtual? I |
| 12 |
> know that we are eventually going that way, which was the reasoning |
| 13 |
> behind me supporting both. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Once some pesky xkb problems are tracked down. Maybe a few other things |
| 16 |
too like the opengl-update issue I mentioned elsewhere in this thread as |
| 17 |
well. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives