| 1 |
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 11:14, lv@××××××××××.org wrote: |
| 2 |
> it's masked due to a bug in portage that is apparently not being fixed ("you |
| 3 |
> shouldnt be using that anyway" is the response we got to the bug). if both |
| 4 |
> xorg-x11 and this xfree are unmasked, for some reason an attempt to install |
| 5 |
> one will try to install the other. xorg-x11 is stable on amd64... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> i'm not on the xfree herd, but i remember this being a PITA on amd64. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I guess this also brings up the question, when is xorg-x11 going to be |
| 10 |
stable on each arch and when will it be the default for the virtual? I |
| 11 |
know that we are eventually going that way, which was the reasoning |
| 12 |
behind me supporting both. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 16 |
Developer |
| 17 |
Games/LiveCD Teams |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |
Archives