1 |
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:22:32PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
2 |
> Am Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2017, 19:06:36 CET schrieb William L. Thomson Jr.: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > The day everyone wanted has come, after this message. I will |
5 |
> > unsubscribe not to return. You all won in 2008, and again in 2017. |
6 |
> > Though this time I will not be back. I tried more than most anyone else |
7 |
> > would for a very long time. Gentoo wins I lose, I am fine with that. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Please do not contact me off list in IRC or at all. I am done with the |
10 |
> > Gentoo community! |
11 |
> |
12 |
> <comrel hat> |
13 |
> Independent of whether William now unsubscribed or not, he's now enjoying a |
14 |
> lengthy (1 year until review) vacation from all Gentoo communication channels. |
15 |
> </comrel hat> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> -- |
18 |
> Andreas K. Hüttel |
19 |
> dilfridge@g.o |
20 |
> Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
21 |
|
22 |
So, mgorny threatened to leave if something wasn't done, right? I saw |
23 |
the IRC conversation about unsubscribing from gentoo-dev, as well. IRC |
24 |
is not private, for the record. Other developers are required to |
25 |
subscribe to -dev, and are expected to follow it so they stay informed. |
26 |
If they missed something covered on the list, they are directed to the |
27 |
archives and (usually) laughed at. I see no reason for this expectation |
28 |
to be waived for any single developer. Do I get a free pass if I don't |
29 |
like what someone says? |
30 |
|
31 |
It's not enough to let wltjr leave on his own; you had to create a ban |
32 |
and add a smug, tongue-in-cheek mail to it to maintain the image of |
33 |
doing something. Quite hypocritical of comrel's attitude of secrecy to |
34 |
suddenly announce a ban. It seems to me that secrecy is only adopted |
35 |
when it suits those who stand to benefit from it. |
36 |
|
37 |
Great things coming from Gentoo "leadership" here. What will you do when |
38 |
mgorny starts targeting developers and pitching tantrums over them, too? |
39 |
Are we going to stratify developership further, too? It seems rather |
40 |
clear to me that a few individuals see themselves as the owners of this |
41 |
distro and bend it to suit their whims, using bureacracy to obscure |
42 |
their actions and motivations, segment the community, and block those |
43 |
less experienced. This is precisely why we have unmotivated developers |
44 |
and a bevy of unmaintained packages; nobody wants to contribute to a |
45 |
distro that treats its users (and developers) so poorly. |
46 |
|
47 |
A distro should never bend its entire social structure to protect the |
48 |
feelings of one surly developer (or his/her entourage), but naturally |
49 |
since every council member is friends with mgorny and comrel is afraid |
50 |
to take any action against him, they'll make exceptions to established |
51 |
procedures and ignore any complaints about the way he treats others. |
52 |
|
53 |
Software cannot fix wetware. Plenty of developers get to deal with |
54 |
mgorny's aggressive and insulting tone, yet nothing happens. Gee... I |
55 |
wonder why. Maybe because the upper parts of Gentoo are riddled with |
56 |
cronyism. |
57 |
|
58 |
"Rules for thee, not for me." |
59 |
|
60 |
It's clear to anyone with eyeballs that there is preferential treatment |
61 |
and inconsistent enforcement of rules in this community, and the people |
62 |
in a position to fix it, won't, because they in fact benefit from this. |
63 |
|
64 |
Unfortunately, GLEP 39 does not have a section on recalling or |
65 |
impeachment... This whole situation highlights why the Council has no |
66 |
business sticking its head into non-technical matters. It's clearly not |
67 |
up to the task. It's no surprise, since technical skill does not |
68 |
guarantee or even imply social skill. (or vice-versa) |
69 |
|
70 |
I'm tired of people beating around the bush and the facile attempts of |
71 |
tact: why do you give special treatment to certain members of this |
72 |
community? Would you have done anything different if it were me or some |
73 |
other developer who was proposing this change? |
74 |
|
75 |
It wouldn't have made it to the Council agenda if he didn't write it, |
76 |
period. Everyone else would've been told to suck it up and deal with it. |
77 |
And knowing how the Council is, in a few days we'll all get to deal with |
78 |
the churn of mailing lists to protect one person's ego. Sad. |
79 |
|
80 |
~zlg |
81 |
-- |
82 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer, Trustee, Treasurer |
83 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
84 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |