| 1 |
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:17:18 -0500 |
| 2 |
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Alexandre Buisse wrote: [Wed Apr 04 2007, 02:36:43PM CDT] |
| 4 |
> > I won't take this to the council myself, but I think this should be |
| 5 |
> > discussed at the very least: we need a way to limit the council |
| 6 |
> > power, since it seems there is nothing to this effect in the |
| 7 |
> > metastructure glep. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> For what it's worth, I deliberately wrote the GLEP that way. The |
| 10 |
> truth of the matter is that the Council has only whatever power the |
| 11 |
> devs permit, so adding additional restrictions seems like a really bad |
| 12 |
> idea to me. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Right. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Unfortunately, what the GLEP doesn't do is prevent the Council from |
| 17 |
having secret meetings and refusing to discuss not only the content of |
| 18 |
those meetings but even the topic. Perhaps a requirement that any |
| 19 |
Council meeting logs be made public would be useful, with a waiver |
| 20 |
that the Council can have a secret meeting if it officially announces |
| 21 |
that it is doing so? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives