1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 18/07/12 03:55 PM, Michael Mol wrote: |
5 |
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> |
6 |
> wrote: |
7 |
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> On 18/07/12 03:47 PM, Michael Mol wrote: |
10 |
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés |
11 |
>>> <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
12 |
>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Michael Mol |
13 |
>>>> <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>>> The real benefit is that it allows you to mount any |
16 |
>>>> partition, if the tools to mount it live in the same |
17 |
>>>> partition. |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> Certainly that's a benefit. |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> ...don't you mean, "if the tools to mount it live in the |
23 |
>> initramfs" ?? |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> if the partition isn't mounted I don't see how the initramfs |
26 |
>> will allow you to mount it using its own tools... |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I think you're replying to Canek. I took it to mean that having an |
29 |
> initramfs allows you to mount the very filesystems where you would |
30 |
> _traditionally_ expect to find the tools. E.g., being able to mount |
31 |
> an encrypted /. |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
Yeah i was.. i just wanted to re-emphasize the point that the tools |
35 |
to mount it need to be on the initramfs (in whatever version or form |
36 |
they were when the initramfs was built), and really have nothing to do |
37 |
with them (including their current and possibly more up-to-date |
38 |
version) living on said partition.. |
39 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
40 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
41 |
|
42 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlAHFZUACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAiMAD/eWHxvaZPu1ikYN9ZeClsEWnB |
43 |
pBDgfVPC0UTDeoUOVFcA+gKCmqa+lhs0x+arJhF7AZfWEbYb+jMK+bVxUVgfElR4 |
44 |
=O0O4 |
45 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |