Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:09:06
Message-Id: 50071595.7020605@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge by Michael Mol
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 18/07/12 03:55 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
5 > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
6 > wrote:
7 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
8 >>
9 >> On 18/07/12 03:47 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
10 >>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés
11 >>> <caneko@×××××.com> wrote:
12 >>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Michael Mol
13 >>>> <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote:
14 >>>>
15 >>>> The real benefit is that it allows you to mount any
16 >>>> partition, if the tools to mount it live in the same
17 >>>> partition.
18 >>>
19 >>> Certainly that's a benefit.
20 >>>
21 >>
22 >> ...don't you mean, "if the tools to mount it live in the
23 >> initramfs" ??
24 >>
25 >> if the partition isn't mounted I don't see how the initramfs
26 >> will allow you to mount it using its own tools...
27 >
28 > I think you're replying to Canek. I took it to mean that having an
29 > initramfs allows you to mount the very filesystems where you would
30 > _traditionally_ expect to find the tools. E.g., being able to mount
31 > an encrypted /.
32 >
33
34 Yeah i was.. i just wanted to re-emphasize the point that the tools
35 to mount it need to be on the initramfs (in whatever version or form
36 they were when the initramfs was built), and really have nothing to do
37 with them (including their current and possibly more up-to-date
38 version) living on said partition..
39 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
40 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
41
42 iF4EAREIAAYFAlAHFZUACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAiMAD/eWHxvaZPu1ikYN9ZeClsEWnB
43 pBDgfVPC0UTDeoUOVFcA+gKCmqa+lhs0x+arJhF7AZfWEbYb+jMK+bVxUVgfElR4
44 =O0O4
45 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----