Archives
Archives
| From: | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] using one portage tree for development and portage itself | ||
| Date: | Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:40:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1098286843.18230.6.camel@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] using one portage tree for development and portage itself by Chris Gianelloni |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 08:38 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 | > Don't actually edit files in your CVS tree. Edit them in your overlay |
| 3 | > then move them over. While this does create extra steps, it ensures you |
| 4 | > are accidentally commiting something you might be in-development on that |
| 5 | > could potentially break systems. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | s/are/aren't/ |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Unless of course you meant to say that we should accidentally commit |
| 10 | things like this? =) |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |