Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:36:44
Message-Id: 200507011833.53946.danarmak@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass by Jonathan Smith
1 On Friday 01 July 2005 18:14, Jonathan Smith wrote:
2 > - gpg control packet
3 >
4 > Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
5 > > Btw, what's wrong with the `DEPEND="$(your_function)" || die`
6 > >
7 > > i've proposed? Using a return code seems to be the simplest way
8 > > to signal a failure, no?
9 >
10 > calling a function in a global scope is a bad idea. it leads to lots of
11 > unneccessary (and timely) computations
12 Necessary in the case of kde split ebuilds. Take a look at
13 kde-functions.eclass::deprange().
14
15 --
16 Dan Armak
17 Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
18 Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
19 Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass foser <foser@g.o>