Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jonathan Smith <smithj@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:16:50
Message-Id: 42C55DCC.6090807@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass by Thomas de Grenier de Latour
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
5 > Btw, what's wrong with the `DEPEND="$(your_function)" || die`
6 > i've proposed? Using a return code seems to be the simplest way
7 > to signal a failure, no?
8 >
9
10 calling a function in a global scope is a bad idea. it leads to lots of
11 unneccessary (and timely) computations
12
13 remember your ebuild/end-of-mentoring quiz?
14
15 - --
16
17 smithj
18
19 Gentoo Developer
20 [ desktop-misc && netmon && documentation ]
21
22
23 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
24 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
25 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
26
27 iD8DBQFCxV3Ml5AvwDPiUowRAhosAJ9IWOLs3Eknu3BB/NwkKyAGpx/W3gCfag0P
28 dbjvgc97tDcrjHE5WSfLtiY=
29 =XX8N
30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>