Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 20:21:39
Message-Id: 200507012219.20388.pauldv@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass by Jonathan Smith
1 On Friday 01 July 2005 17:14, Jonathan Smith wrote:
2 > Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
3 > > Btw, what's wrong with the `DEPEND="$(your_function)" || die`
4 > >
5 > > i've proposed? Using a return code seems to be the simplest way
6 > > to signal a failure, no?
7 >
8 > calling a function in a global scope is a bad idea. it leads to lots of
9 > unneccessary (and timely) computations
10
11 It also makes any attempts to parse ebuilds without using bash (our current
12 strategy) a lot harder (actually causing bash reimplementation)
13
14 Paul
15
16 --
17 Paul de Vrieze
18 Gentoo Developer
19 Mail: pauldv@g.o
20 Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>