Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:05:55
Message-Id: 20050701170324.3368bfbd@eusebe
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass by Dan Armak
1 On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:45:57 +0300
2 Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> wrote:
3
4 >
5 > I'd rather signal failure to code outside the subshell by
6 > touching a file in $T.
7 >
8
9 The ${T} directory does not exists when portage source an ebuild
10 to get its metadatas, so I'm not sure that's a good idea.
11
12 Btw, what's wrong with the `DEPEND="$(your_function)" || die`
13 i've proposed? Using a return code seems to be the simplest way
14 to signal a failure, no?
15
16 --
17 TGL.
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass Jonathan Smith <smithj@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>