Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer stabilizations
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:02:06
Message-Id: 54AED3C0.8050606@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer stabilizations by Michael Orlitzky
1 08.01.2015 21:12, Michael Orlitzky пишет:
2 > On 01/08/2015 12:57 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
3 >> 08.01.2015 20:15, Michael Orlitzky пишет:
4 >>> I vaguely remember a discussion about maintainers stabilizing their own
5 >>> packages -- maybe just on x86 and amd64 -- to take the load off of the
6 >>> arch teams.
7 >>>
8 >>> Did that really happen or am I making it up? Is it written down anywhere?
9 >>>
10 >> amd64/x86 are major arches. They can be stabilized if package maintainer
11 >> has appropriate hardware. Even without arch teams membership.
12 >>
13 > What's a major arch? The devmanual still says[0],
14 >
15 > Moving a package from ~arch to arch is done only by the relevant arch
16 > teams.
17 >
18 > According to [1] that section is no longer correct, but only x86 and
19 > amd64 are exceptions to the rule that used to be exceptions but then
20 > weren't anymore.
21 >
22 > I'm going to write a devmanual patch but don't want to sound like a lunatic.
23 >
24 >
25 > [0] http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html
26 > [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/89711
27 >
28 >
29
30 Major arches are amd64 and x86, nothing more. There is a bug for it
31 already [1]
32
33 [1] - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510198

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer stabilizations Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>