| 1 |
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 15:51 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Creation of a new categories is fine. pkg moves are bad. |
| 4 |
> > See the countless other posting on this subject of why pkg |
| 5 |
> > moves are bad. |
| 6 |
> yeah new packages is my primary concern. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> >> Any objections, problems with the plan, comments? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Sure I'll step up and say I object to the part of your plan which |
| 11 |
> > involves a shitton of pkgmoves. Moving pkgs from existing categories |
| 12 |
> > into another category causes numerous problems that portage can't solve |
| 13 |
> > as easy as the rest of us might think so please just don't do that |
| 14 |
> > part. I've got no objection to the creation of a new category for *new* |
| 15 |
> > packages. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I talked with you in IRC about this more. We will do the package moves only |
| 18 |
> when a bump occurs and will make sure that stable as well as ~arch get an |
| 19 |
> updated ebuild. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Sweet/Thanks that works and provides a clear path to upgrade/bump. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives