1 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 |
> Creation of a new categories is fine. pkg moves are bad. |
3 |
> See the countless other posting on this subject of why pkg |
4 |
> moves are bad. |
5 |
yeah new packages is my primary concern. |
6 |
|
7 |
>> Any objections, problems with the plan, comments? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Sure I'll step up and say I object to the part of your plan which |
10 |
> involves a shitton of pkgmoves. Moving pkgs from existing categories |
11 |
> into another category causes numerous problems that portage can't solve |
12 |
> as easy as the rest of us might think so please just don't do that |
13 |
> part. I've got no objection to the creation of a new category for *new* |
14 |
> packages. |
15 |
|
16 |
I talked with you in IRC about this more. We will do the package moves only |
17 |
when a bump occurs and will make sure that stable as well as ~arch get an |
18 |
updated ebuild. |
19 |
|
20 |
Best regards, |
21 |
Stefan |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |