Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implicit vs explicit dependencies
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:50:06
Message-Id: 20061023204648.6aa495b5@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] implicit vs explicit dependencies by Alin Nastac
1 On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:34:21 +0300 Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | Up till now, I relied on implicit dependencies (dependencies of my
4 | dependencies).
5 | Apparently now (see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152534) we
6 | should add every atom that an ebuild depends on to (R)DEPEND.
7 | Which is the right way?
8
9 You can rely upon things in the RDEPEND chain and things in system being
10 there. You can't rely upon things merely in a DEPEND chain.
11
12 If you do rely upon RDEPEND chain items, you should be aware that if a
13 new version of a package comes out and removes one of the items, stuff
14 breaks. It's generally not a good idea to get toooooo over-reliant upon
15 nth level deps because of this (but equally, don't go over the top).
16
17 --
18 Ciaran McCreesh
19 Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
20 Web : http://ciaranm.org/
21 as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature