Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: wes chow <wes@×××××××××.net>
To: Moritz Schulte <moritz@×××××××××××××××.de>
Cc: Greg Corcoran <gregc@××××××.com>, Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@××××××.nl>, "gentoo-dev@g.o" <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper Gentoo Name (was License criteria for Gentoo)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:09:33
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.44.0209251007180.8808-100000@hitchcock.woahnelly.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper Gentoo Name (was License criteria for Gentoo) by Moritz Schulte
1 I agree with that conclusion.
2
3
4 On 25 Sep 2002, Moritz Schulte wrote:
5
6 > wes chow <wes@×××××××××.net> writes:
7 >
8 > > Gentoo is Portage. Portage needs GNU utilities like a fish needs a
9 > > bicycle.
10 >
11 > If you look at it this way, then Portage, and therefore Gentoo, does
12 > not need Linux at all.
13 >
14 > moritz
15 > --
16 > moritz@×××××××××××××××.de - http://duesseldorf.ccc.de/~moritz/
17 > GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
18 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper Gentoo Name (was License criteria for Gentoo) Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@××××××.nl>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper Gentoo Name (was License criteria for Gentoo) Evan Read <eread@×××××××××.org>