| 1 |
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 10:38 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:19:15 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Grobian <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On 10-11-2005 21:33:48 +0000, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > We need to establish *one* authoritative source of news. We can't |
| 7 |
> > > do that if we simultaneously launch several sources of news all at |
| 8 |
> > > once. We have to launch *one* service first, give the userbase time |
| 9 |
> > > to adjust to that, and then start making the news available via |
| 10 |
> > > additional sources. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Yep, so create that central source on the web, and fork off mailing |
| 13 |
> > list posts, RSS-feeds and stuff based on this central repository. |
| 14 |
> > Also let portage warn users based on the information in this |
| 15 |
> > repository. We can start creating and populating the central web |
| 16 |
> > resource _right now_, as all the infrastructure is there. The |
| 17 |
> > mailing lists shouldn't be a problem as well. It all makes sense... |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> No, the central repository certainly shouldn't be on the web (whatever |
| 20 |
> that means in the first place), it has to be somewhere in CVS |
| 21 |
> (easily accessible by all devs, though not necessarily in a direct way) |
| 22 |
> and should be replicated to as many channels as possible (the website |
| 23 |
> being one of them). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
How about gentoo/news in CVS? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 29 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 30 |
x86 Architecture Team |
| 31 |
Games - Developer |
| 32 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives