| 1 |
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> - keys are revoked [3] |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> yes |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> To facilitate this, should we pick a preferred keyserver or two? Devs |
| 8 |
> of course are welcome to use others also, but if we're going to check |
| 9 |
> for revocations, we should specify where devs should upload them to in |
| 10 |
> order to make sure they hit the tree/etc. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The preference need not be strictly applied, but even though those |
| 13 |
> keyservers are supposed to talk to each other I've found that I get |
| 14 |
> fairly different results if I refresh against various ones. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
in practice, i think we've been requiring hkp://subkeys.pgp.net |
| 17 |
-mike |
Archives