| 1 |
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 02:36:14PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> > To facilitate this, should we pick a preferred keyserver or two? Devs |
| 3 |
> > of course are welcome to use others also, but if we're going to check |
| 4 |
> > for revocations, we should specify where devs should upload them to in |
| 5 |
> > order to make sure they hit the tree/etc. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > The preference need not be strictly applied, but even though those |
| 8 |
> > keyservers are supposed to talk to each other I've found that I get |
| 9 |
> > fairly different results if I refresh against various ones. |
| 10 |
> in practice, i think we've been requiring hkp://subkeys.pgp.net |
| 11 |
Subkeys.pgp.net is a rotation that's been a bit buggy of late. |
| 12 |
Of the 5 IPs in it right now: |
| 13 |
- 2 respond to pings, but not connections |
| 14 |
- 1 totally unreachable |
| 15 |
- 2 that work, but have slightly different versions of my key. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The SKS rotation seems to be much better, and kingtaco was looking at |
| 18 |
running an additional SKS instance within Gentoo as our offical key |
| 19 |
point (also useful for speeding up fetching keys in verification). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 22 |
http://sks-keyservers.net/status/ |
| 23 |
http://sks-keyservers.net/overview-of-pools.php |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 27 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
| 28 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 29 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives