| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 11/21/2013 04:21 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, hasufell wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>> For the time being, it will be listed as a top-level project. |
| 8 |
>>> (There were some ideas that Licenses could be a subproject of |
| 9 |
>>> another TLP, but so far this hasn't worked out.) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> It should be a subproject of QA. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Indeed, that's one of the two TLPs that were suggested. The past |
| 14 |
> QA disliked having Licenses as their subproject, though. It depends |
| 15 |
> on how the role of QA is defined: If it is seen as primarily |
| 16 |
> technical, then Licenses (which is largely non-technical) doesn't |
| 17 |
> fit so well. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Ulrich |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
ACCEPT_LICENSE is a user-controlled variable that has global effect on |
| 23 |
a gentoo installation. |
| 24 |
If our tree is not consistent in terms of thoroughness of license |
| 25 |
information, then that decreases user experience and we'll likely lose |
| 26 |
people who take "free software" seriously. |
| 27 |
So to me this is definitely a QA issue. |
| 28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 30 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSjzpSAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzu7gIAJMs7//HK9fMNqHnSZMit/3Y |
| 33 |
hph+pKU/fgwK8qqc1qhkW2jHuxKL7Dq0ElNHNJ0+Vap242gsVDDcMAgtQHYViRTi |
| 34 |
k0jSVDWEYxGbXzquIkcAFvQyKQDXVdNFoca9Sn2OCDJ91sSokzibQbNoSiIDvKKd |
| 35 |
PSI0Rza0VupW/Lb6fqE998VAuL3rA4rqss8u59MZPgV9NztZIcKvAseSuSIxyu3z |
| 36 |
XBfkauktBrFAM7qOO1Hxkgrxl2709ty/deX+24sIuyip1k9ORjeNcR169c++3VrA |
| 37 |
yHp18KShlAJCTaf1CLBVeUz7DV+k5CzDw+loXcrbyoTGML8T8zIjZRzXisJHUng= |
| 38 |
=08Gq |
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives