1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, hasufell wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> For the time being, it will be listed as a top-level project. |
4 |
>> (There were some ideas that Licenses could be a subproject of |
5 |
>> another TLP, but so far this hasn't worked out.) |
6 |
|
7 |
> It should be a subproject of QA. |
8 |
|
9 |
Indeed, that's one of the two TLPs that were suggested. The past QA |
10 |
disliked having Licenses as their subproject, though. It depends on |
11 |
how the role of QA is defined: If it is seen as primarily technical, |
12 |
then Licenses (which is largely non-technical) doesn't fit so well. |
13 |
|
14 |
Ulrich |