| 1 |
Le mardi 28 janvier 2014 à 13:11 +0000, Steven J. Long a écrit : |
| 2 |
> Alec Warner wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Sorry, I work on Portage. What I'm saying is that We are free to change the |
| 4 |
> > behavior of *portage* now; rather than waiting for a new EAPI. If an ebuild |
| 5 |
> > needs to define EAPI=eapi-next to 'correctly' use XDG_*, well that is |
| 6 |
> > someone else's can of worms. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Agreed: portage can clear those vars from the env as mgorny stated on the bug, |
| 9 |
> and an xdg.eclass (or w/e) can setup good defaults for packages which need |
| 10 |
> them. Presumably it'd be inherited by gnome and kde eclasses, for example, |
| 11 |
> so most people wouldn't even see it. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Exactly. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 17 |
Gentoo |
Archives