Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Jan Kundrát" <jkt@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: GLEP 42 (news) Round Seven
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 12:20:59
Message-Id: 43BFB18C.8030403@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: GLEP 42 (news) Round Seven by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 Duncan wrote:
2 > Because that code will be implemented in portage, and the portage dev
3 > likely to implement it said it was a superfluous reference. =8^)
4 >
5 > Still, I'd prefer it referenced just for definition's sake, but when the
6 > portage dev says it isn't a superfluous reference, and that particular
7 > section is specifying portage implementation...
8
9 Nope, that particular section is specifying methods of interaction
10 between Portage and user.
11
12 Cheers,
13 -jkt
14
15 --
16 cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: GLEP 42 (news) Round Seven Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>