| 1 |
We have to keep a reasonnable size (not too deeper) imho. But 3 or even |
| 2 |
4 levels (rare) sounds nice to me. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 19:14:00 +0000 |
| 5 |
Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> It would also seem that could change the entire portage tree structure |
| 8 |
> (for the better?): |
| 9 |
> app/games/arcade/somegame |
| 10 |
> kde (the metapackage we currently have) |
| 11 |
> kde/base/kdelibs |
| 12 |
> kde/base/kdebase |
| 13 |
> etc... |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> On Thursday 04 September 2003 06:07 pm, Camille Huot wrote: |
| 16 |
> > Hmmm |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Maybe you already have discussed it, but how about make more than 2 |
| 19 |
> > levels in portage, as in OpenBSD's ports tree ? |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > ie: |
| 22 |
> > app-games/action |
| 23 |
> > app-games/arcade |
| 24 |
> > etc. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > I think this WILL be necessary one day |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> > my 2 cents |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> - -- |
| 32 |
> Luke-Jr |
| 33 |
> Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 34 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Camille Huot - <cam@××××××.net> |
| 38 |
direct contact on #igoan at irc.freenode.net |
Archives