1 |
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:11 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote: |
2 |
> Please don't remove it, and don't replace it with xmms2. There are far too many |
3 |
> media type plugins that work for xmms that audacious and similar players can't |
4 |
> handle. Also, will xmms plugins even work in xmms2? And isn't xmms2 still a |
5 |
> command line-only application? Not what users need or want. Perhaps the most |
6 |
> compelling reason to keep xmms around and *not* use xmms2 is the one you just made: |
7 |
> |
8 |
Yes xmms2 is just the "server" it needs clients to be like the old xmms. |
9 |
But it contains a modern design and it will be able to support almost |
10 |
every type of plugins that the current xmms supports. |
11 |
|
12 |
> > Xmms2 is a good player that needs of course ages of |
13 |
> > development to be able to be like xmms. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> So, don't dump a product that's not even near alpha status on users. If we want |
16 |
> to keep using software that's old, but works just fine, why force a really |
17 |
> stupid switch? |
18 |
> |
19 |
It's not alpha status... it's very close to a final product afaik. It's |
20 |
working fine(apart from scons crap :P) and the design provides very easy |
21 |
maintainence compared to the old xmms. |
22 |
|
23 |
> Can you provide a list of open fairly important bugs for xmms that provide good |
24 |
> examples of why you don't want to maintain it? Just so we can see your reasoning. |
25 |
> |
26 |
You can just look at bugs.g.o and those bugs are not easy to fix. Most |
27 |
of them require lot's of time to dive into the sources and fix it on a |
28 |
repository (upstream job). For a distro maintainer like us it's a pain |
29 |
to maintain it. |
30 |
|
31 |
> You may think xmms is obsolete, but it has a pretty decent niche among the |
32 |
> available player choices; I know I'm not alone in my affinity for it. Please |
33 |
> keep it. At the very least, if it has to go, don't dump a half-assed alternative |
34 |
> like xmms2 on the users -- sure, xmm2 shows a lot of promise, but it's simply |
35 |
> not ready. xmms is stable; might as well keep it around until we're so far into |
36 |
> future gcc versions that it (and gtk-1) just won't compile any longer on any |
37 |
> arch. ;) |
38 |
If noone takes it will be saved on overlays.gentoo.org. Everyone needs |
39 |
to know that xmms is old and tired (obsolete). A few developers on |
40 |
redhat, mandriva and suse marked xmms as obsolete. Now it's our turn to |
41 |
move it to our darkness repository. If you want to be sure it's obsolete |
42 |
just read xmms's website. |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
46 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~metalgod |
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |