Archives
Archives
| From: | Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules | ||
| Date: | Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:04:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAKmKYaD9PegHTQMXs_bSZsJaNEP840JE7P215U5d4KG9i6Uh7A@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules by Patrick Lauer |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > The daily updated stats [2] show a slow general trend down. |
| 3 | > There's historical data (well, just a few days right now at [3] |
| 4 | |
| 5 | What are you looking at here? .ebuild files in the tree? Or latest |
| 6 | version per-package? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Old EAPI versions are obviously only a burden for developers if there |
| 9 | are actually developers looking at those packages/versions/ebuilds... |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Cheers, |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Dirkjan |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules | Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> |