| 1 |
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Also there's some debate in IRC about whether or not these packages |
| 4 |
> should be lastrited or dropped to maintainer-needed. These forks are |
| 5 |
> not in good shape upstream, so I think it makes better sense to |
| 6 |
> p.mask/lastrite and then move them to the graveyard overlay when I |
| 7 |
> remove them from the tree in 30 days. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
IMO the criteria should be whether they work or not. Not whether |
| 11 |
upstream is more or less active. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If they're blockers on other work, by all means cull them. However, |
| 14 |
if the biggest problem with them is that they're using a few inodes in |
| 15 |
the repo, then they should probably stay. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Rich |
Archives