1 |
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:42:14 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > Also there's some debate in IRC about whether or not these packages |
5 |
> > should be lastrited or dropped to maintainer-needed. These forks are |
6 |
> > not in good shape upstream, so I think it makes better sense to |
7 |
> > p.mask/lastrite and then move them to the graveyard overlay when I |
8 |
> > remove them from the tree in 30 days. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> |
11 |
> IMO the criteria should be whether they work or not. Not whether |
12 |
> upstream is more or less active. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> If they're blockers on other work, by all means cull them. However, |
15 |
> if the biggest problem with them is that they're using a few inodes in |
16 |
> the repo, then they should probably stay. |
17 |
|
18 |
+1 |
19 |
|
20 |
Best regards, |
21 |
Andrew Savchenko |