Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masking and removing *coin packages
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 14:56:19
Message-Id: 20160708175604.d59c7e85f594b01cb70cd99f@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] masking and removing *coin packages by Rich Freeman
1 On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:42:14 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> wrote:
3 > >
4 > > Also there's some debate in IRC about whether or not these packages
5 > > should be lastrited or dropped to maintainer-needed. These forks are
6 > > not in good shape upstream, so I think it makes better sense to
7 > > p.mask/lastrite and then move them to the graveyard overlay when I
8 > > remove them from the tree in 30 days.
9 > >
10 >
11 > IMO the criteria should be whether they work or not. Not whether
12 > upstream is more or less active.
13 >
14 > If they're blockers on other work, by all means cull them. However,
15 > if the biggest problem with them is that they're using a few inodes in
16 > the repo, then they should probably stay.
17
18 +1
19
20 Best regards,
21 Andrew Savchenko