| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, MIkey wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>>> I |
| 9 |
>>> would also like to have them excluded from binary packages. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> That can't be right can it? You mean, like openoffice-bin, or like the |
| 13 |
>> ones you build yourself? I know that I often build on one system, install |
| 14 |
>> on several, and when I do that, I really want them to be identical. I |
| 15 |
>> think if you have your no-docs-of-any-kind option, you get your wish as to |
| 16 |
>> locally built packages, but if you really mean things like openoffice-bin, |
| 17 |
>> I doubt that any openoffice user would want it with absolutely no |
| 18 |
>> documentation. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Yes, if I say -doc or specify FEATURES="nodoc", I don't want the docs in |
| 21 |
> there, binary package or not. I want the behavior and results to be |
| 22 |
> consistent. I am not talking about things like the internal openoffice |
| 23 |
> help documentation, I am talking about anything that goes |
| 24 |
> into /usr/share/doc, man pages, and info pages. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I misinterpreted what you wrote. I thought you meant "physically included |
| 28 |
in the package," not "installed from a binary package." I just completely read |
| 29 |
what looks like a reasonable request and turned it into nonsense without |
| 30 |
thinking about it, I guess. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Regards, |
| 33 |
Ferris |
| 34 |
- -- |
| 35 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
| 36 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc) |
| 37 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
iD8DBQFECeluQa6M3+I///cRArbCAKChFkOo8JVxW8eFbjh5++Jk387omQCcDZRR |
| 41 |
sofHhKeCBKhJuG3d60ZtyLo= |
| 42 |
=XCXt |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives