Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Benjamin Smee (strerror)" <strerror@g.o>
To: gentoo-core@l.g.o
Cc: Daniel Goller <morfic@g.o>, devrel@g.o, recruiters@g.o, gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Disenchantment
Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:43:17
Message-Id: 200605080939.38787.strerror@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Disenchantment by Daniel Goller
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 lo,
5
6 On Sunday 07 May 2006 06:00, Daniel Goller wrote:
7 <snip>
8
9 I can honestly say that after reading your entire email I was no more
10 enlightened on what you were actually disenchanted about then before.
11 Perhaps your lack of clarity in your email reflects some emotional state
12 or perhaps a lack of crystalization of your thoughts. Either way I'd
13 suggest not making sweeping massive generalizations about "us" and "we"
14 with nothing to back it up and in a derrogatory manner. If you are
15 leaving then thanks for all your work and efforts, but trying to snipe at
16 things on your way out the door is just immature. If on the other hand
17 you weren't meaning to snipe I'd suggest taking more time to write a
18 little more clearly and suggest some concrete solutions.
19
20
21 - --
22 Benjamin Smee (strerror)
23 crypto/forensics/netmail/netmon/ldap
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v1.9.20 (GNU/Linux)
26
27 iD8DBQFEXwPKAEpm7USL54wRApTkAJ0fNwmffcwRCSjXlgUZqVc/VBO9+gCfSV0g
28 I03Retor+2mXKjUQVDYJlfk=
29 =wl+E
30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list