| 1 |
10.06.2013 19:15, Alex Legler пишет: |
| 2 |
> On 10.06.2013 14:36, Sergey Popov wrote: |
| 3 |
>> 09.06.2013 18:22, Alex Legler пишет: |
| 4 |
>>> I'd appreciate some input on below plan to move project pages to the Wiki: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> Motivation |
| 7 |
>>> ---------- |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> The main motivation is to reduce the contents on the main website, |
| 10 |
>>> allowing for an easier makeover. Also, the Wiki exposes the contents and |
| 11 |
>>> an editing capability to more people, allowing for better collaboration. |
| 12 |
>>> Finally, this is an opportunity for projects to go through the contents |
| 13 |
>>> in their project spaces and update/remove outdated contents as well |
| 14 |
>>> Gentoo as a whole to remove orphaned projects. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Err, i do not want to say that wiki is not suite for this purpose, but |
| 17 |
>> what's wrong with current situation? Is there something wrong with gorg? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> The software is unmaintained, and the website template is next to |
| 20 |
> unmaintainable. I could go on a bit more about this, but I think these |
| 21 |
> two points *alone* justify moving away from it. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
>> Well, it is not always clear how to use some of it's features, but apart |
| 24 |
>> of that, why we should migrate to wiki? |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> Just to clear orphaned project pages? |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> No, I described multiple points. Again: |
| 29 |
> - Less contents on www.g.o -> we can much more easily relaunch it |
| 30 |
> - Users can more easily contribute to project documentation |
| 31 |
> - Update/purge project documentation |
| 32 |
> - Remove orphaned projects |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I did not know that gorg is not maintained. So yeah, in that case, i |
| 36 |
understand your decision. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> Why we can not just have official project pages, maintained as usual |
| 40 |
>> through gorg and additional info in wiki(if it is needed, for example, |
| 41 |
>> like we do on Gentoo Qt project page? |
| 42 |
>> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> In case it wasn't clear enough yet: This is step 1 of n to get rid of |
| 45 |
> gorg and GuideXML for the website (read: not main docs) aspects of Gentoo. |
| 46 |
> Running two project page venues increases maintenance instead of |
| 47 |
> lowering it. I intend to have less work after this change, not more. |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> Do you have any concerns beyond 'never change a running system'? |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
For now - no, i am not. Thanks for clearing things for me. |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-- |
| 55 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 56 |
Gentoo developer |
| 57 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
| 58 |
Gentoo Qt project lead |
Archives