| 1 |
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:50:05 -0400 |
| 2 |
NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> From what I've seen, HACKING is a fairly common doc in FOSS projects. |
| 5 |
> It doesn't seem to have been included in the default DOCS for |
| 6 |
> einstalldocs in EAPI6. While going through the MATE packages, I noticed |
| 7 |
> that we have quite a few packages that include HACKING in DOCS, so I |
| 8 |
> cannot delete the DOCS array and take advantage of the automagic doc |
| 9 |
> detection feature of einstalldocs. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Does anyone know why we omitted this file from the default DOCS? A |
| 12 |
> quick grep of the main repo shows ~370 ebuilds with HACKING listed. Is |
| 13 |
> this file no longer considered worthy of being included by default in |
| 14 |
> our installed docs? If so, looking for advice on whether it is worth |
| 15 |
> keeping or dropping that file from my packages? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
File a Future EAPI bug asking to include it in EAPI 7. I don't see |
| 18 |
a reason to omit it by default. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Michał Górny |
| 23 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives