| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:34:02PM +0100, Steve Long wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> > I'm pretty sure it will be actually no loss for Gentoo, since those |
| 4 |
> > folks that contributed to my retirement far outweigh the benefit I |
| 5 |
> > could ever possibly be to this project. This can be clearly evidenced |
| 6 |
> > by their long-lasting good record as in [1] and [2] and [3]. In |
| 7 |
> > devrel's own words, one needs to "respect the wishes of maintainers". |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> Man first you devs think it's your god-given right to behave nastily to any |
| 10 |
> usr, then you get all sensitive about Jakub on bugzilla. That is lame, imo. |
| 11 |
> Maybe there should be something about requiring a thick skin to be a dev, |
| 12 |
> since you so clearly require it of usrs. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
On the contrary we warn people about not behaving badly and if that |
| 15 |
doesn't help despite many warnings and complaints being filed we finally |
| 16 |
take to firmer action which is exactly what have happened in this case. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> So who watches the watchmen? IOW who does one take a complaint about devrel |
| 19 |
> to, and will there be any action? |
| 20 |
Complaints about devrel actions should be sent to the Gentoo Council as |
| 21 |
I've said several times before regarding this and other devrel |
| 22 |
decisions. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
Bryan Østergaard |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives