| 1 |
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 08:19, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Roy Marples posted <200601091232.32522.uberlord@g.o>, excerpted |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> below, on Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:32:32 +0000: |
| 5 |
> > baelayout-1.12 is a bit more strict about things. If you ask something to |
| 6 |
> > --stop it stops regardless. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Creating a new subthread on a slightly different subtopic, tho still |
| 9 |
> initscripts/baselayout. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I've noticed that with baselayout-1.12 (not sure on <1.12 as I didn't |
| 12 |
> notice it, tho that might mean it's new behavior), changing runlevels |
| 13 |
> stops, then restarts, services that are in both runlevels. At least RH |
| 14 |
> style initscripts simply keep running services that exist in both the old |
| 15 |
> and new runlevels, as they aren't in the kill-list, only the start-list. |
| 16 |
> Is it intended behavior on Gentoo to force them to stop, only to restart |
| 17 |
> them on the new runlevel, when they exist in both? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Nope, that's an error. I think I have a patch that addresses that. |
| 20 |
I've also noticed that there is a lot of stuff in runscript.sh that doesn't |
| 21 |
need to be there anymore as rc now handles more of the ordering and |
| 22 |
dependency. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Leaving runscript.sh with just what it "needs" means it's a whole load |
| 25 |
lighter :) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o> |
| 29 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives