| 1 |
Isn't this kind of against what glep40 set out to do? |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 1/28/07, Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> Hi, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> As we all notice from time to time, amd64 team is lacking behind a bit, |
| 7 |
> due to various reasons. a) manpower, b) a lot of keywording. |
| 8 |
> Java team asked arch teams if they object when Java team marks stable |
| 9 |
> generation-2 ebuilds on their own, due to the long time it takes and to |
| 10 |
> the amount of ebuilds to be stabilised. |
| 11 |
> So, maybe we can discuss here another helping hand for amd64. Devs |
| 12 |
> that work with a given software (not necessarily the maintainer) on |
| 13 |
> amd64 architecture and when there is a keywording bug open, then said |
| 14 |
> devs can keyword the ebuild. For a short period of time this could be |
| 15 |
> allowed to all devs. |
| 16 |
> Any objections? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> V-Li |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives