| 1 |
On 11 Aug 2003 13:19:28 -0400 |
| 2 |
Lisa Marie Seelye <lisa@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Well since I haven't heard anything from the non-x86 people I'm going to |
| 5 |
> bump 2.8-r2 to stable on those arches and 2.9 to x86 (I'll post a formal |
| 6 |
> announcement after I get 2.10 in). |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
(Note: this is in general as well as specifically to this instance). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DO NOT MAKE THIS DEFAULT BEHAVIOR. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Right now most non-x86 arches have a small number of devs and a small |
| 13 |
amount of time in which to test. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I would like to request (was going to GLEP it when time permits) that if |
| 16 |
you want to test something for an arch you can't test, please make a bug |
| 17 |
for it. This way it's sure to get visibility and you actually know that |
| 18 |
an arch person tested it. Mailing lists are a poor way to ask for testing |
| 19 |
and the testing requests are easily lost in the myraids of email that a |
| 20 |
dev has to read when they get home from work/school/whatever each day. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thanks, |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Jason Wever |
| 25 |
Gentoo/Sparc Team Lead |
Archives