From: | Lisa Marie Seelye <lisa@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable? | ||
Date: | Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:16:51 | ||
Message-Id: | 1060622367.1721.22.camel@lisa.thedoh.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable? by Lisa Marie Seelye |
1 | On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 20:41, Lisa Marie Seelye wrote: |
2 | > Well guys? Anyone brave enough to use distcc-2.8-r2 on a non-x86 arch? |
3 | > I think its time to get those other arches up to date. Let me know if |
4 | > there are any problems or if I can bump them up! |
5 | |
6 | Well since I haven't heard anything from the non-x86 people I'm going to |
7 | bump 2.8-r2 to stable on those arches and 2.9 to x86 (I'll post a formal |
8 | announcement after I get 2.10 in). |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Regards, |
12 | -Lisa |
13 | <Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior> |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable? | Jason Wever <weeve@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable? | Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> |