| 1 |
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:19:28PM -0400, Lisa Marie Seelye wrote: |
| 2 |
> Well since I haven't heard anything from the non-x86 people I'm going to |
| 3 |
> bump 2.8-r2 to stable on those arches and 2.9 to x86 (I'll post a formal |
| 4 |
> announcement after I get 2.10 in). |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
*eek!!* |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
/me hides from the fall out |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
seriously, would not recommend it. Have you assigned bugs to the arch's for |
| 11 |
testing? x86 is easy, but for the arch's there's always a lack of manpower |
| 12 |
undercutting their ability to test new stuff - they're usually busy making |
| 13 |
sure the currently supported stuff is still working. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
| 20 |
| http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 21 |
| #gentoo-dev on irc.freenode.net |
| 22 |
Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.freenode.net |
| 23 |
Perl Guy | |
| 24 |
| GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E |
| 25 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives