| 1 |
Bryan Østergaard wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:00:42PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Bryan Østergaard wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>> Bryan, |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> You and Danny have clearly shown your bias towards paludis take over and |
| 12 |
>> support of Gentoo. It's fairly poor taste to FORCE this through during a |
| 13 |
>> non-regular meeting for something that paludis is lacking. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> It's AMAZING how fast you guys are to clamor and fix what you call a QA |
| 16 |
>> issue and other problems when we've had issues highlighted for years |
| 17 |
>> that the council can't move on. But once it's a possible issue with |
| 18 |
>> paludis you guys are quick to respond. |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> Please stop the conspiracy theories. This has nothing to do with paludis |
| 22 |
> and everything to do with what we consider sane in the tree - no matter |
| 23 |
> which package manager you use. And as stated otherwise paludis already |
| 24 |
> supports multiple suffixes even if it's not in a released version yet so |
| 25 |
> it's not an issue for paludis either. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Regards, |
| 28 |
> Bryan Østergaard |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
It's not a sane tree. There have been very specific uses cases that have |
| 31 |
been discussed on ML and in #-dev that have highlighted the possible |
| 32 |
need for this. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Like I said before, if you're concerned about tree QA.. There's bigger |
| 35 |
and worse things out there that have been in the wild for much longer. I |
| 36 |
expect the council to now start taking FAST action on those issues. |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives