Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Bryan Østergaard" <kloeri@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:36:11
Message-Id: 20070424203307.GB10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by Doug Goldstein
1 On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:00:42PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
2 > Bryan Østergaard wrote:
3 > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
4 > >
5 > Bryan,
6 >
7 > You and Danny have clearly shown your bias towards paludis take over and
8 > support of Gentoo. It's fairly poor taste to FORCE this through during a
9 > non-regular meeting for something that paludis is lacking.
10 >
11 > It's AMAZING how fast you guys are to clamor and fix what you call a QA
12 > issue and other problems when we've had issues highlighted for years
13 > that the council can't move on. But once it's a possible issue with
14 > paludis you guys are quick to respond.
15 >
16 Please stop the conspiracy theories. This has nothing to do with paludis
17 and everything to do with what we consider sane in the tree - no matter
18 which package manager you use. And as stated otherwise paludis already
19 supports multiple suffixes even if it's not in a released version yet so
20 it's not an issue for paludis either.
21
22 Regards,
23 Bryan Østergaard
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies