Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86

[Doug Goldstein]

Bryan Østergaard wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
>> Stephen Bennett wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400
>>> Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> So apparently as little as 1 council member can make a decision and it
>>>> be binding unless appealed to the entire council at the next meeting.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> There were three council members who happened to be around at the time,
>>> and those three agreed unanimously. That seems reasonable to me for an
>>> interim decision.
>>>
>>>
>> Is it that serious of an issue that it needed to be done as such and
>> could not wait for a regular council meeting?
>>
>> Granted I understand it's important for you paludis users since paludis
>> doesn't support that.
>>  But I'm talking about real Gentoo users that use Portage.
>>
>> I think we are setting a VERY dangerous precedent by allowing a subset
>> of council members to make decisions as a whole if they decide to make a
>> decision outside of a normal session.
>>
>> Who were the 3?
>>
> Already stated in another reply on this thread but the three council
> members were robbat2, kugelfang and myself.
>
> Regards,
> Bryan Østergaard
>
Bryan,

You and Danny have clearly shown your bias towards paludis take over and
support of Gentoo. It's fairly poor taste to FORCE this through during a
non-regular meeting for something that paludis is lacking.

It's AMAZING how fast you guys are to clamor and fix what you call a QA
issue and other problems when we've had issues highlighted for years
that the council can't move on. But once it's a possible issue with
paludis you guys are quick to respond.

Very poor taste....
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list