| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400 |
| 4 |
> > Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> >> So apparently as little as 1 council member can make a decision and it |
| 8 |
> >> be binding unless appealed to the entire council at the next meeting. |
| 9 |
> >> |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > There were three council members who happened to be around at the time, |
| 12 |
> > and those three agreed unanimously. That seems reasonable to me for an |
| 13 |
> > interim decision. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> Is it that serious of an issue that it needed to be done as such and |
| 16 |
> could not wait for a regular council meeting? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Granted I understand it's important for you paludis users since paludis |
| 19 |
> doesn't support that. |
| 20 |
> But I'm talking about real Gentoo users that use Portage. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I think we are setting a VERY dangerous precedent by allowing a subset |
| 23 |
> of council members to make decisions as a whole if they decide to make a |
| 24 |
> decision outside of a normal session. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Who were the 3? |
| 27 |
Already stated in another reply on this thread but the three council |
| 28 |
members were robbat2, kugelfang and myself. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Regards, |
| 31 |
Bryan Østergaard |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives