1 |
Stephen Bennett wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400 |
3 |
> Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>> So apparently as little as 1 council member can make a decision and it |
7 |
>> be binding unless appealed to the entire council at the next meeting. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> There were three council members who happened to be around at the time, |
11 |
> and those three agreed unanimously. That seems reasonable to me for an |
12 |
> interim decision. |
13 |
> |
14 |
Is it that serious of an issue that it needed to be done as such and |
15 |
could not wait for a regular council meeting? |
16 |
|
17 |
Granted I understand it's important for you paludis users since paludis |
18 |
doesn't support that. |
19 |
But I'm talking about real Gentoo users that use Portage. |
20 |
|
21 |
I think we are setting a VERY dangerous precedent by allowing a subset |
22 |
of council members to make decisions as a whole if they decide to make a |
23 |
decision outside of a normal session. |
24 |
|
25 |
Who were the 3? |
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |